Next: Bibliography
Up: Multiple Integrals
Previous: Repeated Integrals and Fubini's
  Contents
  Index
Another technique that can sometimes be useful when trying to evaluate
a double (or triple etc) integral generalise the familiar method of
integration by substitution.
Assume we have a change of variable
x = x(u, v) and
y = y(u, v). Suppose that the region S' in the uv - plane is
transformed to a region S in the xy - plane under this
transformation. Define the Jacobian of the transformation as
J(
u,
v) =

=

.
It turns out that this correctly describes the relationship between
the element of area dx dy and the corresponding area element
du dv.
With this definition, the change of variable formula becomes:

f (
x,
y) d
x d
y =

f (
x(
u,
v),
y(
u,
v))
J(
u,
v)

d
u d
v.
Note that the formula involves the modulus of the Jacobian.
Solution. Let A be the disc centred at 0 and radius R. The area of A is
thus

dx dy. We evaluate the integral by changing to
polar coordinates, so consider the usual transformation
x = r cos
,
y = r sin
between Cartesian and polar
co-ordinates. We first compute the Jacobian;

= cos

,

= sin

,

= -
r sin

,

=
r cos

.
Thus
J(
r,

) =

=

=
r(cos
2
+ sin
2
) =
r.
We often write this result as
dA =
dx dy =
r dr d
Using the change of variable formula, we have

dx d
y =


|
J(
r,

)| d
r d

=

r d
r d

= 2


.
We thus recover the usual area of a circle.
Note that the Jacobian
J(r,
) = r > 0, so we did indeed take
the modulus of the Jacobian above.
Example 9.10
Find the volume of a ball of radius 1.
Solution. Let V be the required volume. The ball is the set
{(x, y, z) | x2 + y2 + z2
1}. It can be thought of as twice the volume
enclosed by a hemisphere of radius 1 in the upper half plane, and so
V = 2


d
x d
y
where the region of integration D consists of the unit disc
{(x, y) | x2 + y2
1}. Although we can try to do this
integration directly, the natural co-ordinates to use are plane
polars, and so we instead do a change of variable first. As
in 9.9, if we write
x = r cos
,
y = r sin
, we have
dx dy = r dr d
. Thus
V = 2 dx dy |
= |
2 ( ) r dr d |
|
| |
= |
2 d  dr |
|
| |
= |
4 -  ![$\displaystyle \left.\vphantom{-\frac{(1-r^2)^{3/2}}{3}}\right]_{0}^{1}$](img826.gif) |
|
| |
= |
. |
|
Note that after the change of variables, the integrand is a product,
so we are able to do the dr and d
parts of the integral at
the same time.
And finally, we show that the same ideas work in 3 dimensions. There
are (at least) two co-ordinate systems in
3 which are useful when
cylindrical or spherical symmetry arises. One of these,
cylindrical polars is given by the transformation
x =
r cos

,
y =
r sin

,
z =
z,
and the Jacobian is easily calculated as

=
r so
dV =
dx dy dz =
r dr d
dz.
The second useful co-ordinate system is spherical polars with transformation
x =
r sin

cos

,
y =
r sin

sin

,
z =
r cos

.
The transformation is illustrated in Fig 9.3.
Figure 9.3:
The transformation from Cartesian to spherical polar
co-ordinates.
|
|
It is easy to check that Jacobian of this transformation is given by
dV =
r2sin
dr d
d
=
dx dy dz.
Example 9.11
The moment of inertia of a solid occupying the region
R, when
rotated about the
z - axis is given by the formula
Calculate the moment of inertia about the z-axis of the solid of
unit density which lies outside the cylinder of radius a, inside the
sphere of radius 2a, and above the x - y plane.
Solution. Let I be the moment of inertia of the given solid about the z-axis. A diagram of a cross section of the solid is shown in Fig 9.4.
Figure 9.4:
Cross section of the right hand half of the solid outside a
cylinder of radius a and inside the sphere of radius 2a
|
|
We use cylindrical polar co-ordinates
(r,
, z); the Jacobian
gives
dx dy dz = r dr d
dz, so
We thus have a single integral. Using the substitution
u = 4a2 - r2, you can check that the integral evaluates to
22
a5/5.
Exercise 9.12
Show that
(where the integral is over the unit ball
x2 +
y2 +
z2 
1)
first by using spherical polars, and then by doing the
z integration first and using plane polars.
Next: Bibliography
Up: Multiple Integrals
Previous: Repeated Integrals and Fubini's
  Contents
  Index
Ian Craw
2002-01-07