We have now seen that when a power series is used to define a
function, then that function is very well behaved, and we can
manipulate it by manipulating, in the obvious way, the corresponding
power series. However there are snags. A function has one
definition which works everywhere it makes sense (at least for simple
functions), whereas the power series corresponding to a function
depends also on the point about which the expansion is happening. An
example will probably make this clearer than further discussion.
Example 7.14
Give the power series expansions for the function
f (x) = .
Solution. We can already do this about 0 by the Binomial Theorem; we have:
= 1 + x + x2 + x3 +...+ xn +... for | x| < 1.
To expand about a different point, e.g. about 3, write y = x - 3. Then
= = = - .,
and again using the Binomial Theorem on the last representation, we
have
It should be no surprise that this is the Taylor series for the same
function about the point 3. And it is in fact not an accident that
the radius of convergence of the new series is 2. More investigation
(quite a lot more - mainly for complex functions) shows the radius of
convergence is always that of the largest circle that can be
fitted into the domain of definition of the function. And that is why
it is of interest to sometimes consider power series as complex power
series. The power series expansion for
(1 + x2)-1 has radius of
convergence 1. This seems implausible viewed with real spectacles,
but totally explicable when it is realised that the two points i
and - i are stopping the expansion from being valid in a larger
circle.