There is a similar definition of ``limit from the right'', writen as
f (x) = l
Solution. As x
2 -,
f (x) = 3 - x
1 +, so the left hand limit is 1.
As x
2 +,
f (x) = x/2
1 +, so the right hand limit is 1.
Thus the left and right hand limits agree
(and disagree with f (2), so f is not continuous at 2).
Note our convention: if
f (x)
1 and always
f (x)
1 as x
2 -, we say that f (x) tends to 1 from above, and write
f (x)
1 + etc.
This splits the problem of finding whether a limit exists into two parts; we can look on either side, and check first that we have a limit, and second, that we get the same answer. For example, in 4.2, example 5, both 1-sided limits exist, but are not equal. There is now an obvious way of checking continuity.
Show that f is continuous at 1. [In fact f is continuous everywhere].Solution. We use the above criterion. Note that f (1) = 1. Also
Show that f is continuous at 0. [In fact f is continuous everywhere].
[Recall the result of 4.2, example 4]
Solution. Note that if x < 0 then | x| = - x and so is continuous, while if x > 0, then | x| = x and so also is continuous. It remains to examine the function at 0. From these identifications, we see that
| x| = 0 +, while
| x| = 0 +. Since
0 + = 0 - = 0 = | 0|, by the 4.12, | x| is continuous at 0